Free 25-Hydroxyvitamin D: Impact of Vitamin D Binding Protein Assays on Racial-Genotypic Associations
- Carrie M. Nielson
- Kerry S. Jones
- Rene F. Chun
- Jon Jacobs
- Ying Wang
- Martin Hewison
- John S. Adams
- Christine M. Swanson
- Christine G. Lee
- Dirk Vanderschueren
- Steven Pauwels
- Ann Prentice
- Richard Smith
- Tujin Shi
- YGYuqian Gao
- Athena Schepmoes
- Joseph M. Zmuda
- Jodi Lapidus
- Jane A. Cauley
- Roger Bouillon
- Inez Schoenmakers
- Eric Orwoll
- YGYuqian Gao
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · 2016 · Oxford University Press
5 views · 0 downloads
Abstract
CONTEXT: Total 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD) is a marker of vitamin D status and is lower in African Americans than in whites. Whether this difference holds for free 25OHOD (f25OHD) is unclear, considering reported genetic-racial differences in vitamin D binding protein (DBP) used to calculate f25OHD. OBJECTIVES: Our objective was to assess racial-geographic differences in f25OHD and to understand inconsistencies in racial associations with DBP and calculated f25OHD. DESIGN: This study used a cross-sectional design. SETTING: The general community in the United States, United Kingdom, and The Gambia were included in this study. PARTICIPANTS: Men in Osteoporotic Fractures in Men and Medical Research Council studies (N = 1057) were included. EXPOSURES: Total 25OHD concentration, race, and DBP (GC) genotype exposures were included. OUTCOME MEASURES: Directly measured f25OHD, DBP assessed by proteomics, monoclonal and polyclonal immunoassays, and calculated f25OHD were the outcome measures. RESULTS: Total 25OHD correlated strongly with directly measured f25OHD (Spearman r = 0.84). Measured by monoclonal assay, mean DBP in African-ancestry subjects was approximately 50% lower than in whites, whereas DBP measured by polyclonal DBP antibodies or proteomic methods was not lower in African-ancestry. Calculated f25OHD (using polyclonal DBP assays) correlated strongly with directly measured f25OHD (r = 0.80-0.83). Free 25OHD, measured or calculated from polyclonal DBP assays, reflected total 25OHD concentration irrespective of race and was lower in African Americans than in US whites. CONCLUSIONS: Previously reported racial differences in DBP concentration are likely from monoclonal assay bias, as there was no racial difference in DBP concentration by other methods. This confirms the poor vitamin D status of many African-Americans and the utility of total 25OHD in assessing vitamin D in the general population.
